Felix Maschewski und Anna-Verena Nosthoff im Gespräch mit der Privacy-Expertin Frederike Kaltheuner über WählerInnen-Targeting, Cybermanifestos und die Frage nach der (digitalen) Technik é: Der in Stanford lehrende Datenwissenschaftler Michal Kosinski,
von Felix Maschewski und Anna-Verena Nosthoff „Alles lebt ausschließlich auf der Grundlage seines Verschwindens, und wenn man die Dinge in aller Hellsichtigkeit interpretieren will, muß man es unter Berücksichtigung ihres Verschwindens
When humanity faces the possibility of self-destruction, is survival the only meaningful question left? Or should we also ask whether different kinds of “ending” exist—some imposed by a few, others
“I get so frustrated with consulting firms,” a CIO from a manufacturing company once admitted during a conversation that stuck with me for years. “They always operate at 30,000 feet.
von Bernhard Jarosch Wie lassen sich Missstände kritisieren? In aller Regel – und insbesondere in den (Geistes-)Wissenschaften – sind die Ansätze dazu so einfühlsam wie Abstandshalter. Mit den Dingen, die man bespricht,










It’s hard to point to a single moment when society became “digital.” There was no switch flipped overnight, no clear before and after. Instead, what we’ve been living through is
The 1996 U.S. presidential election is often remembered for something political analysts called the “gender gap.” Women voted for Bill Clinton over Bob Dole by a wide margin (59% to
Most people roll their eyes when they hear the word “affirmations.” And honestly, that reaction makes sense. A lot of what circulates online feels fake, overly positive, or completely disconnected
There is a strange feeling that defines the present moment: the sense that everything is speeding up, yet nothing is truly moving forward. Technology becomes more powerful every year, communication
It is possible for acts of care to be simultaneously admirable and politically problematic. Caring for others, communities, or democratic processes may improve immediate conditions while still unintentionally sustaining systems
Abstract When humanity faces the possibility of self-destruction, is survival the only meaningful question left? Or should we also ask whether different kinds of “ending” exist—some imposed by a few,