von Oliver Marchart Was ist kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit? Diese Frage, die im Zentrum des vorliegenden Buches steht, ist alles andere als trivial.* Zu dem schweren metaphysischen Ballast, den unser Denken immer
There is a strange feeling that defines the present moment: the sense that everything is speeding up, yet nothing is truly moving forward. Technology becomes more powerful every year, communication
This article examines how modern capitalism is shaped not only by economic structures but also by the way modern societies perceive and relate to material objects. It argues that post-Enlightenment
// Reflections on the book launch: Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri ‘Assembly’ | Westminster University, London, 12th October 2017 von Alessio Kolioulis and Rahel Süß Thebook launch of Assembly at
Ein Gespräch mit der Philosophin und Theaterwissenschaftlerin Jules Buchholtz, deren Buch Wem gehört die Zukunft? Wissen und Wahrheit im Szenario szenariomatische Vorausschau als Kulturtechnik und Regierungsmittel untersucht. Dieses, so die These, übe










It’s hard to point to a single moment when society became “digital.” There was no switch flipped overnight, no clear before and after. Instead, what we’ve been living through is
The 1996 U.S. presidential election is often remembered for something political analysts called the “gender gap.” Women voted for Bill Clinton over Bob Dole by a wide margin (59% to
Most people roll their eyes when they hear the word “affirmations.” And honestly, that reaction makes sense. A lot of what circulates online feels fake, overly positive, or completely disconnected
There is a strange feeling that defines the present moment: the sense that everything is speeding up, yet nothing is truly moving forward. Technology becomes more powerful every year, communication
It is possible for acts of care to be simultaneously admirable and politically problematic. Caring for others, communities, or democratic processes may improve immediate conditions while still unintentionally sustaining systems
Abstract When humanity faces the possibility of self-destruction, is survival the only meaningful question left? Or should we also ask whether different kinds of “ending” exist—some imposed by a few,